La técnica de contrainmunoelectroforesis para la determinación de anticuerpos antirrábicos
Counterimmunoelectrophoresis for the determination of anti-rabies antibodies
Loading...
Cite
Díaz, A. M. O. de, Arispe, E., Brunel, C., Cavándoli, C., Dellepiane, N., & Miranda, A. (1986). La técnica de contrainmunoelectroforesis para la determinación de anticuerpos antirrábicos [Journal articles]. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/16873
Date
1986
Document Number
ISBN
eISBN
ISSN
DOI
Other Language Versions
Description
Notes
Pages
Volume
Replaces
Table of contents
Link to WHO's original document
Link to WHO's original document
Category
Youtube URI
Citation
Status Mendates
Collections
License
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Item Uso de anticuerpos monoclonales para el diagnóstico rápido de los virus respiratorios : Memorándum de una Reunión de la OMS(1993)La OMS ha preparado un estuche de diagnóstico con anticuerpos monoclonales (basado en la técnica de inmunofluorencencia) para detectar directamente los antígenos del virus sincitial, los virus de la influenza A y B, los virus de la parainfluenza (tipos 1,2 y 3) y los adenovirus. Durante 1990 y 1991, se invito a 16 laboratorios de diferentes partes del mundo a ensayar el estuche en el medio clínico. En el presente memorándum se resumen los resultados obtenidos y las discusiones y recomendaciones de los participantes en una Reunión Consultiva para la Vigilancia Mundial de los Virus Respiratorios, celebrada por la OMS en Ginebra del 25 al 27 de marzo de 1992Item Medición de los anticuerpos contra el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana: estudio internacional en colaboración para evaluar los sueros de referencia de la OMS(s.d.)Two preparations of human sera, one reactive against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the other unreactive, were evaluated as potential international reference reagents (IRR) in an international collaborative study. Twenty-one laboratories participated and tested these and five other human sera which were found to range from highly reactive to unreactive. The proposed "positive" IRR was found to react strongly in all immunoassays and gave all the expected bands in immunoblot systems using HTLV-III, LAV-I or similar virus strains as antigens. The "unreactive" serum was judged to be negative by ELISA and immunoblots. The end-points determined by ELISAs varied considerably between laboratories, even between those using the same commercial kit. This variation was reduced somewhat when the reactivities of the samples were expressed relative to the proposed IRR