Consenso latinoamericano para definir, categorizar y notificar patógenos multirresistentes, con resistencia extendida o panresistentes
Loading...
Cite
Jiménez Pearson, M. A., Galas, M., Corso, A., Hormazábal, J. C., Duarte Valderrama, C., Salgado Marcano, N., Ramón-Pardo, P., & Melano, R. G. (2019). Consenso latinoamericano para definir, categorizar y notificar patógenos multirresistentes, con resistencia extendida o panresistentes [Journal articles]. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51470
Date
2019
Document Number
ISBN
eISBN
ISSN
Other Language Versions
Description
[RESUMEN]. Se presenta un consenso latinoamericano que permite estandarizar las definiciones de los diferentes niveles de resistencia a los antimicrobianos en bacterias de importancia en salud pública. Se describen los criterios de inclusión y exclusión para las metodologías a utilizar y para los antibióticos a incluir (por disponibilidad, relevancia y existencia de puntos de corte). Como propuesta piloto se eligieron tres microorganismos gramnegativos de gran impacto en el ambiente hospitalario (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Acinetobacter spp.). La falta de puntos de corte para ciertos antibióticos (por ejemplo, tigeciclina, fosfomicina y colistina), claves para el tratamiento de infecciones causadas por estos patógenos que presentan multirresistencia o resistencia extendida, llevó a la necesidad de discutir y consensuar puntos de corte provisorios para la vigilancia de la resistencia a estos fármacos. Se abordó y consensuó también el uso de pruebas de sensibilidad alternativas a los métodos aprobados por las guías internacionales, de aplicación más sencilla como pruebas de rutina en los laboratorios de bacteriología clínica. El principal beneficio de este documento es proporcionar a los laboratorios latinoamericanos un marco estandarizado y consensuado para la identificación y la vigilancia constante y unificada de microorganismos resistentes. Las recomendaciones incluidas en este documento son el resultado consensuado por los representantes de los laboratorios nacionales de referencia de los países que integran la Red Latinoamericana de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antibióticos coordinada por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud
[ABSTRACT]. This document presents a Latin American consensus to standardize definitions of different levels of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of public health importance. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described for antibiotics to include (availability, relevance, and existence of cut-off values) and for methodologies to use. Three gram-negative microorganisms with a great impact in the hospital environment (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp.) were selected as a pilot proposal. The lack of cut-off values for certain antibiotics (e.g., tigecycline, fosfomycin, and colistin), crucial in treating infections caused by multi-drug resistant or extensively drug-resistant pathogens, led to the need to discuss and agree on provisional cut-off values for monitoring resistance to these drugs. The work team also addressed and reached consensus on easier-to-use alternative susceptibility tests, other than methods approved by international guidelines, for routine testing in clinical bacteriology laboratories. The main benefit of this document is to provide Latin American laboratories with a standardized and consensual framework for the identification and constant and unified surveillance of resistant microorganisms. The recommendations included in this document are the result of consensus among representatives of the national reference laboratories in the countries belonging to the Latin American Surveillance Network of Antimicrobial Resistance, coordinated by the Pan American Health Organization.
[RESUMO]. É apresentado um consenso latino-americano para padronizar a definição dos graus de resistência antimicrobiana em bactérias de importância em saúde pública. São descritos os critérios de inclusão e exclusão para os antibióticos a serem incluídos (disponibilidade, relevância e pontos de corte de sensibilidade) e metodologias a serem usadas. Como proposta-piloto, foram selecionados três microrganismos Gram-negativos de grande impacto no ambiente hospitalar (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa e Acinetobacter spp.). Diante da falta de pontos de corte para alguns antibióticos (como tigeciclina, fosfomicina e colistina), essenciais para o tratamento de infecções causadas por patógenos com multirresistência ou resistência ampliada, foram debatidos e aprovados pela maioria pontos de corte provisórios para a vigilância da resistência a estes fármacos. Também foi discutido e aprovado o uso de testes de suscetibilidade alternativos aos métodos aprovados pelas diretrizes internacionais, mais simples de serem realizados como testes de rotina nos laboratórios de bacteriologia clínica. A principal contribuição deste documento é oferecer aos laboratórios latino-americanos um sistema padronizado e consensual para a identificação de microrganismos resistentes e a vigilância contínua e uniforme destes patógenos. As recomendações aqui contidas foram feitas por consenso por representantes dos laboratórios nacionais de referência dos países que integram a Rede Latino-Americana de Vigilância da Resistência Antimicrobiana, coordenada pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS).
[ABSTRACT]. This document presents a Latin American consensus to standardize definitions of different levels of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of public health importance. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are described for antibiotics to include (availability, relevance, and existence of cut-off values) and for methodologies to use. Three gram-negative microorganisms with a great impact in the hospital environment (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp.) were selected as a pilot proposal. The lack of cut-off values for certain antibiotics (e.g., tigecycline, fosfomycin, and colistin), crucial in treating infections caused by multi-drug resistant or extensively drug-resistant pathogens, led to the need to discuss and agree on provisional cut-off values for monitoring resistance to these drugs. The work team also addressed and reached consensus on easier-to-use alternative susceptibility tests, other than methods approved by international guidelines, for routine testing in clinical bacteriology laboratories. The main benefit of this document is to provide Latin American laboratories with a standardized and consensual framework for the identification and constant and unified surveillance of resistant microorganisms. The recommendations included in this document are the result of consensus among representatives of the national reference laboratories in the countries belonging to the Latin American Surveillance Network of Antimicrobial Resistance, coordinated by the Pan American Health Organization.
[RESUMO]. É apresentado um consenso latino-americano para padronizar a definição dos graus de resistência antimicrobiana em bactérias de importância em saúde pública. São descritos os critérios de inclusão e exclusão para os antibióticos a serem incluídos (disponibilidade, relevância e pontos de corte de sensibilidade) e metodologias a serem usadas. Como proposta-piloto, foram selecionados três microrganismos Gram-negativos de grande impacto no ambiente hospitalar (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa e Acinetobacter spp.). Diante da falta de pontos de corte para alguns antibióticos (como tigeciclina, fosfomicina e colistina), essenciais para o tratamento de infecções causadas por patógenos com multirresistência ou resistência ampliada, foram debatidos e aprovados pela maioria pontos de corte provisórios para a vigilância da resistência a estes fármacos. Também foi discutido e aprovado o uso de testes de suscetibilidade alternativos aos métodos aprovados pelas diretrizes internacionais, mais simples de serem realizados como testes de rotina nos laboratórios de bacteriologia clínica. A principal contribuição deste documento é oferecer aos laboratórios latino-americanos um sistema padronizado e consensual para a identificação de microrganismos resistentes e a vigilância contínua e uniforme destes patógenos. As recomendações aqui contidas foram feitas por consenso por representantes dos laboratórios nacionais de referência dos países que integram a Rede Latino-Americana de Vigilância da Resistência Antimicrobiana, coordenada pela Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS).
Notes
Pages
Volume
Replaces
Table of contents
Link to WHO's original document
Link to WHO's original document
Subject
Youtube URI
Citation
Jiménez Pearson MA, Galas M, Corso A, Hormazábal JC, Duarte Valderrama C, Salgado Marcano N et al. Consenso latinoamericano para definir, categorizar y notificar patógenos multirresistentes, con resistencia extendida o panresistentes. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019;43:e65. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.65
Status Mendates
Collections
License
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Item Antibiotic resistance and consumption before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Valle del Cauca, Colombia(2023)[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To assess changes in antibiotic resistance of eight of the World Health Organization priority bug-drug combinations and consumption of six antibiotics (ceftriaxone, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin) before (March 2018 to July 2019) and during (March 2020 to July 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic in 31 hospitals in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Methods. This was a before/after study using routinely collected data. For antibiotic consumption, daily defined doses (DDD) per 100 bed-days were compared. Results. There were 23 405 priority bacterial isolates with data on antibiotic resistance. The total number of isolates increased from 9 774 to 13 631 in the periods before and during the pandemic, respectively. While resistance significantly decreased for four selected bug-drug combinations (Klebsiella pneumoniae, extended spectrum beta lactamase [ESBL]-producing, 32% to 24%; K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant, 4% to 2%; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem-resistant, 12% to 8%; Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resis- tant, 23% to 9%), the level of resistance for Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin significantly increased (42% to 57%). There was no change in resistance for the remaining three combinations (Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant; Escherichia coli, ESBL-producing; E. coli, carbapenem-resistant). Consumption of all anti- biotics increased. However, meropenem consumption decreased in intensive care unit settings (8.2 to 7.1 DDD per 100 bed-days). Conclusions. While the consumption of antibiotics increased, a decrease in antibiotic resistance of four bug-drug combinations was observed during the pandemic. This was possibly due to an increase in commu- nity-acquired infections. Increasing resistance of E. faecium to vancomycin must be monitored. The findings of this study are essential to inform stewardship programs in hospital settings of Colombia and similar contexts elsewhere.Item Bloodstream infections and antibiotic resistance at a regional hospital, Colombia, 2019–2021(2023)[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To assess antibiotic susceptibility of World Health Organization (WHO) priority bacteria (Acine- tobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pneumoniae) in blood cultures at the Orinoquía regional hospital in Colombia. Methods. This was cross-sectional study using routine laboratory data for the period 2019–2021. Data on blood samples from patients suspected of a bloodstream infection were examined. We determined: the total number of blood cultures done and the proportion with culture yield; the characteristics of patients with priority bacteria; and the type of bacteria isolated and antibiotic resistance patterns. Results. Of 25 469 blood cultures done, 1628 (6%) yielded bacteria; 774 (48%) of these bacteria were WHO priority pathogens. Most of the priority bacteria isolated (558; 72%) were gram-negative and 216 (28%) were gram-positive organisms. Most patients with priority bacteria (666; 86%) were hospitalized in wards other than the intensive care unit, 427 (55%) were male, and 321 (42%) were ≥ 60 years of age. Of the 216 gram-positive bacteria isolated, 205 (95%) were Staphylococcus aureus. Of the 558 gram-negative priority bacteria isolated, the three most common were Escherichia coli (34%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (28%), and Acinetobacter bau- mannii (20%). The highest resistance of Staphylococcus aureus was to oxacillin (41%). For gram-negative bacteria, resistance to antibiotics ranged from 4% (amikacin) to 72% (ampicillin). Conclusions. Bacterial yield from blood cultures was low and could be improved. WHO priority bacteria were found in all hospital wards. This calls for rigorous infection prevention and control standards and continued surveillance of antibiotic resistance.Item Disparities in antimicrobial consumption and resistance within a country: the case of beta-lactams in Argentina(2021)[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever a relação entre o consumo de antimicrobianos e a resistência bacteriana no nível subna-cional na Argentina em 2018, considerando o grupo dos betalactâmicos no estudo de caso.Métodos. O consumo de antimicrobianos foi representado por doses diárias definidas (DDD) por 1.000 habi-tantes. Foi registrada a resistência de Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae e Staphylococcus aureus aos betalactâmicos. A relação entre consumo e resistência foi calculada com base no “R” para cada região do país e os dados da Argentina foram comparados aos de outros países.Resultados. Os betalactâmicos de maior consumo na Argentina foram amoxicilina (3,64) no grupo das pen-icilinas, cefalexina (0,786) no grupo das cefalosporinas de primeira geração, cefuroxima (0.022) no grupo das cefalosporinas de segunda geração, cefixima (0.043) no grupo das cefalosporinas de terceira geração e cefepima (0.0001) no grupo das cefalosporinas de quarta geração. Ao se comparar o consumo de betalac-tâmicos e a resistência bacteriana, observou-se grande disparidade entre as seis regiões do país.Conclusões. O estudo de caso revela diferenças no consumo de antimicrobianos e na resistência dos patógenos mais comuns entre as regiões da Argentina, refletindo realidades distintas dentro do mesmo país. Como esta mesma situação pode estar ocorrendo em outros países, estes achados devem servir para dire-cionar os esforços locais a uma melhor utilização dos antimicrobianos, aperfeiçoar os programas de gestão do uso destes medicamentos e propor estratégias de venda mais apropriadas, visando a prevenir e controlar a resistência aos antimicrobianos.Item Socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean hospitals (2008–2017)(2020)[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To identify socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean hospitals (2008–2017). Methods. We reviewed the scientific literature on socioeconomic factors associated with the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Using multivariate regression, we tested findings from the literature drawing from a longitudinal dataset on antimicrobial resistance from 41 major private and public hospitals and a nationally representative household survey in Chile (2008–2017). We estimated resistance rates for three priority antibiotic–bacterium pairs, as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; i.e., imipenem and meropenem resistant P. aeruginosa, cloxacillin resistant S. aureus, and cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli. Results. Evidence from the literature review suggests poverty and material deprivation are important risk factors for the emergence and transmission of antimicrobial resistance. Most studies found that worse socioeconomic indicators were associated with higher rates of antimicrobial resistance. Our analysis showed an overall antimicrobial resistance rate of 32.5%, with the highest rates for S. aureus (40.6%) and the lowest for E. coli (25.7%). We found a small but consistent negative association between socioeconomic factors (income, education, and occupation) and overall antimicrobial resistance in univariate (p < 0.01) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.01), driven by resistant P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Conclusion. Socioeconomic factors beyond health care and hospital settings may affect the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Preventing and controlling antimicrobial resistance requires efforts above and beyond reducing antibiotic consumption.Item Epidemiological Alert, Nosocomial transmission of NDM-type multiresistant bacteria (19 December 2012)(PAHO, 2012)Since 2008, there has been documented worldwide circulation of microorganisms with antimicrobial resistance mechanism, called "New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase" (NDM), which confers resistance, to all β -lactam antibiotics except aztreonam. These microorganisms are considered multiresistant because they have other mechanisms of resistance to β –lactam antimicrobial drugs, leaving very few therapeutic options for treating patients infected with these bacteria.